Skip to content

The Teenage Allure of ISIS

May 26, 2015

Jihadi flag

The 17-year-old was last seen boarding a train at Victoria Station to fight abroad. Much later, he said: “My politics were driven by emotion. That’s how you see the world at 17. It’s all black and white…” An 18-year-old Briton also left home to fight, but was killed and so could not tell us his reasons for going. The latter was Abdullah Deghayes. The former was Alfred Sherman, knighted co-founder (with Margaret Thatcher) of the Centre for Policy Studies. His war was in Spain, not Syria, and the year he left was 1937, not 2015.

The motives of those two teenagers were similar: zealous commitment to a world-changing ideology; a sense of unjust persecution of fellow-believers; a desire for action to fight that injustice; the smell of adventure; the intoxication of common purpose and the camaraderie that goes with it; the heady pleasure of rebelling; and a glorious sense of purpose, which the young mind craves so much – all bathed in the adolescent delusion of immortality.

These are elements of a story that has been told in every country since human civilisation began; it is a story of teenagers shedding the skin of their child identity and embarking on the painful task of growing a new adult skin that is their own.

Abdullah Deghayes

So should we relax and accept as an inevitable part of the human experience the flight of hundreds of young Britons to the ranks of Islamic State (Isil)? No, because while Alfred and Abdullah had much in common, there are seven major differences that make today’s problems far greater than those of 1937. Some phenomena are new; some are old, but have been amplified by the internet.

Alfred Sherman and his comrades had no doubt that they were “British” as well as socialist, communist or Marxist. A label like “Marxist” is not an exclusive one, that allows you to be both British and Marxist. And the evidence is that such shared superordinate identities reduce intergroup hatred. In 2015, people can feel no shared identity with neighbours because they are living in totally different virtual worlds of internet and satellite TV. This can degrade the common identity arising from physical proximity.

Them and Us.
The stronger the in-group feelings, the more inclined you are to dehumanise members of the out-group. Teenagers crave a sense of belonging because their uncertain role in the world can make them anxious: the clarity offered by a politically evangelical movement can be the strongest of anxiety-reducing drugs.

Mass-Marketing Technologies
Advertisers and propagandists alike know that emotions are the gateway to influence. In 1937, the techniques of mass manipulation of emotions had not been developed; now they are deployed by jihadi groups with professional skill and personally targeted using the very latest methods of digital marketing into the homes of anxious young men and women with conflicted identities.

Off-the-shelf Comrades
You had to work hard in 1937 to find like-minded comrades willing to leave home to fight in a foreign land. In 2015 you can assemble a group in minutes without leaving your bedroom. Peer groups are the greatest influence on what teenagers do and think, and social media can cement them into homogenous cells where no dissenting view on the world can break through.

Web Anonymity
This lets you do things that are out of character. Mouthing a slogan actually changes your attitudes, because of a mental henomenon called “cognitive dissonance”, where the mind strives for consistency between what you do and what you believe.

Teenagers like to rebel as part of their struggle to create their own identity. Muslim teenagers find it difficult to rebel against their communities using the sex, drugs and rock-and-roll techniques beloved of non-Muslim teenagers. Glamorous jihadism offers a much “safer” and culturally more intelligible outlet for teenage rebellion.

Films of Isil beheadings are examples of a corrupting pornography, that, like its sexual equivalent, binds people to a degraded fetish that distorts and dehumanises. The still-developing teenage brain is particularly sensitive to the corrosion of such images.

So what is to be done? The internet and social media must be at the heart of a response to teenage radicalisation. But this will have to be seen as coming from the bottom up if it is not just to become something else to rebel against. And any “positive propaganda” has to be as polished and professional as the films on the jihadi websites. We also have to build plural identities – make people feel British, or American, or Swedish, as well as Muslim – and for positive reasons: anti-immigrant rhetoric is among the most effective recruiting sergeants for the jihadi movement. Finally, 24-hour news channels must stop disseminating the pornography of violence and glamorising the nihilism it represents.

This article was first published in The Daily Telegraph 26th May 2015

7 Comments leave one →
  1. May 26, 2015 2:47 pm

    Thank you for this very insightful article that identifies pornographic violence for what it really is, and for highlighting the psychological impact and influence it has on individuals and society through its dissemination, cleverly concealed under the guise of news, free press and popular media where the lines between entertainment, fiction, news and reality are no longer clear.

  2. May 27, 2015 2:24 pm

    Really enjoyed that Article but am left with a ‘sinking feeling’ when looking for a solution to this seemingly intractable problem. Where does one start in trying to combat the wrongheaded horror of Islamic State?

  3. Simon Moffitt permalink
    June 5, 2015 5:14 am

    There is no doubt of the horror that is ISIS, but like the War On Drugs many teenagers smell hypocrisy a mile off. So while de-radicalization should strip away the romanticization of ISIS propaganda -as well as make sure that Muslims are fully integrated in society- if the West is unwilling to seriously critique its own role in the creation of ISIS and other human rights abuses in the Middle East -which there are many- the cycle of violence and new recruits are sure to follow. Especially when many of those like Maajid Nawaz and Sam Harris either pay lip service or excuse Israeli or US human rights abuses.

    • June 5, 2015 9:32 am

      Simon, you make a good point – there is a dark history of the west’s interventions in that region.

      • Simon Moffitt permalink
        June 6, 2015 2:58 am

        You have things like this though some scholars might disagree on a few points. What I would see as more necessary is a way to counter hawkishness in foreign policy, group-think and the demonisation of the ‘other’ esp Islam. As many establishments in the West are actually complicit in creating and shifting blame. Similar to your work on the effects power and status, I think how group-think, and the effect of power and self-interest also influence government policy will need to be addressed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: